Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment

Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment

Blog Article

Abstract Mismatches between perceived and veridical physiological signals during false feedback (FFB) can bias emotional judgements.Paradigms using auditory FFB suggest perceived changes in heart rate (HR) increase ratings of emotional intensity irrespective of feedback type (increased or decreased HR), implicating # Veterinary supplies : First aid right anterior insula as a mismatch comparator between exteroceptive and interoceptive information.However, few paradigms have examined effects of somatosensory FFB.Participants rated the emotional intensity of randomized facial expressions while they received 20 s blocks of pulsatile somatosensory stimulation at rates higher than HR, lower than HR, equivalent to HR, or no stimulation during a functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging scan.

FFB exerted a bidirectional effect on reported intensity ratings of the emotional faces, increasing over the course of each 20 s stimulation block.Neuroimaging showed FFB engaging regions indicative of affective touch processing, embodiment, and reflex suppression.Contrasting higher vs.lower HR FFB revealed engagement of right insula and centres supporting socio-emotional processing.

Results indicate big boys tee that exposure to pulsatile somatosensory stimulation can influence emotional judgements though its progressive embodiment as a perceived interoceptive arousal state, biasing how affective salience is ascribed to external stimuli.Results are consistent with multimodal integration of priors and prediction-error signalling in shaping perceptual judgments.